On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Sewell <thomas.sewell@nicta.com.au> wrote:

 > There's a bit of history.

  There always is ..

> We did discover once, after verification, that one of the 
> C assertions was wrongly transcribed from its Haskell 
> counterpart, so the debug build of the kernel could 
> panic in a situation where nothing was actually wrong.

  That is an interesting story.

> Well, that's probably more details than you ever wanted to know.

  Actually, this is precisely why I asked.

Thanks,
Dave