On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:51 PM, <Adrian.Danis@data61.csiro.au> wrote:
Right. I don't think we have measured the performance recently so I cannot comment off the top of my head, but at the same time I cannot think of a reason for why it would have changed.

Sounds like recycling is still worthwhile, even though the current user space libraries don't do so. I'm not super familiar with them -- is that due to a design limitation (not using slabs?) or just work not done?

What's the cost of keeping it? Is there a burden on maintenance (particularly with new stuff landing) or re-verification?

Thanks,
Jeff