seL4 developer review of RISC-V privileged ISA spec?
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement? For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list. Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace. The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December. And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress. [1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups. Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean
wrote: The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
I'm so happy to hear this! On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote:
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean
wrote: The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272
I'm also extremely happy to hear this.. Looking forward to reasonable (or
at least effable) specs!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Corey Richardson
I'm so happy to hear this!
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean
wrote: The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote: peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also
released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-p
rivileged-v1.10.pdf
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa -dev/SfEDPLU0NU4/WpAE_A4OBQAJ [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/ isa-dev/hKywNHBkAXM
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- Sent by an Internet
Are there any formal models of the ISA currently, or planned? I'd be
interested in working on one if so - currently mulling what it would take
to port seL4 to privileged-RISC, with the new availability of silicon that
implements some portion of its draft.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Wilson
I'm also extremely happy to hear this.. Looking forward to reasonable (or at least effable) specs!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Corey Richardson
wrote: I'm so happy to hear this!
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean
wrote: The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote: peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also
released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-p
rivileged-v1.10.pdf
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa -dev/SfEDPLU0NU4/WpAE_A4OBQAJ [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/i sa-dev/hKywNHBkAXM
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- Sent by an Internet
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
We are looking at using this one: https://github.com/SRI-CSL/l3riscv
I haven't reviewed it yet, it might not contain much of privileged mode yet.
Cheers,
Gerwin
On 14 Mar 2018, at 12:14, George Hansel
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean
mailto:kelly@prtime.org> wrote: The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272tel:%2B16038524272 _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel -- Sent by an Internet _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
participants (6)
-
Corey Richardson
-
George Hansel
-
Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au
-
Gerwin.Klein@data61.csiro.au
-
Kelly Dean
-
Matthew Wilson