The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean kelly@prtime.org wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
I'm so happy to hear this!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote:
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean kelly@prtime.org wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
I'm also extremely happy to hear this.. Looking forward to reasonable (or at least effable) specs!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Corey Richardson corey@octayn.net wrote:
I'm so happy to hear this!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote:
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean kelly@prtime.org wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4
developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the
draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your
peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also
released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-p
rivileged-v1.10.pdf
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa
-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4/WpAE_A4OBQAJ
[3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/
isa-dev/hKywNHBkAXM
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Are there any formal models of the ISA currently, or planned? I'd be interested in working on one if so - currently mulling what it would take to port seL4 to privileged-RISC, with the new availability of silicon that implements some portion of its draft.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Wilson diakopter@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also extremely happy to hear this.. Looking forward to reasonable (or at least effable) specs!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Corey Richardson corey@octayn.net wrote:
I'm so happy to hear this!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote:
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean kelly@prtime.org wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4
developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the
draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your
peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also
released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-p
rivileged-v1.10.pdf
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa
-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4/WpAE_A4OBQAJ
[3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/i
sa-dev/hKywNHBkAXM
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- Sent by an Internet
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
We are looking at using this one: https://github.com/SRI-CSL/l3riscv
I haven't reviewed it yet, it might not contain much of privileged mode yet.
Cheers, Gerwin
On 14 Mar 2018, at 12:14, George Hansel <george.hansel@gmail.commailto:george.hansel@gmail.com> wrote:
Are there any formal models of the ISA currently, or planned? I'd be interested in working on one if so - currently mulling what it would take to port seL4 to privileged-RISC, with the new availability of silicon that implements some portion of its draft.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Wilson <diakopter@gmail.commailto:diakopter@gmail.com> wrote: I'm also extremely happy to hear this.. Looking forward to reasonable (or at least effable) specs!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Corey Richardson <corey@octayn.netmailto:corey@octayn.net> wrote: I'm so happy to hear this!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 00:18, Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.aumailto:Gernot.Heiser@data61.csiro.au wrote:
Yes, RISC-V specs are high on my priorities. I’ll actually participate in some of the working groups.
Gernot
On 8 Mar 2018, at 05:00, Kelly Dean <kelly@prtime.orgmailto:kelly@prtime.org> wrote:
The RISC-V privileged ISA is not yet finalized. Have the seL4 developers reviewed the draft [1], in case they might have any recommendations for improvement?
For example, just last year a blunder (H-mode) was removed from the draft per a proposal [2] on the mailing list.
Finalization is planned for this year. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
The first public draft of the memory consistency model [3] was also released just last December.
And platform standardization, especially the IOMMU, is in progress.
[1] https://content.riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/riscv-privileged-v1.10.... [2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!msg/isa-dev/SfEDPLU0NU4... [3] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkA...
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- cmr http://octayn.net/ +16038524272tel:%2B16038524272
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
-- Sent by an Internet
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systemsmailto:Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel