Devel June 2015

devel@sel4.systems

21 participants
12 discussions

IA32 syscall bindings
by Norman Feske 26 Aug '16

26 Aug '16

Dear seL4 developers, first, I'd like to thank you for publishing seL4 under GPL. I am very happy that I can finally get my hands dirty with working with the kernel of your group. :-) Currently, I am taking the first baby steps to bring the Genode OS framework (http://genode.org) to seL4. For reference, I am using the experimental branch. The first smallish issue I stumbled upon stems from the fact that Genode is written in C++. By compiling the seL4 syscall bindings with a C++ compiler, I got the following error: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an ‘asm’ It can be reproduced by putting the following code snippet into a cc file and compiling it with 'g++ -m32 -c' (tested with the Genode tool chain as well as with GCC 4.8.1): typedef enum { seL4_SysDebugPutChar = -9, _enum_pad_seL4_Syscall_ID = (1U << ((sizeof(int)*8) - 1)) } seL4_Syscall_ID; void seL4_DebugPutChar(char c) { asm volatile ( "pushl %%ebp \n" "movl %%esp, %%ecx \n" "leal 1f, %%edx \n" "1: \n" "sysenter \n" "popl %%ebp \n" : : "a" (seL4_SysDebugPutChar), "b" (c) : "%ecx", "%edx", "%esi", "%edi", "memory" ); } When compiling the same code snippet with 'gcc' instead of 'g++', everything is fine. It turns out that the C++ compiler does not like the enum value to be specified as input argument. I found the following ways to circumvent this problem: * Changing the enum value 'SysDebugPutChar' to a positive value, * Removing the definition of '_enum_pad_seL4_Syscall_ID', * Casting 'seL4_SysDebugPutChar' to an integer: : "a" ((int)seL4_SysDebugPutChar), In any case, I seem to have to change the bindings. Do you see a way around it? If not, would you consider one of the solutions above for the seL4 headers? On another note, I noticed that the bindings use the EBX register. Unfortunately, this makes it impossible to compile seL4 userland software as position-independent code (PIC). E.g., when compiling the above code snippet via 'g++ -m32 -fPIC -c', the following error occurs: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an ‘asm’ However, PIC is required in order to use shared libraries. The solution would be to not use EBX to pass arguments to the 'asm' statements, save EBX on the stack prior moving the respective kernel argument to the register, and, of course, restoring it after sysenter returns. Before I start changing the bindings, I'd like to know: is there anyone else working on the same problem? Would you be open to accept a change of the bindings to become PIC compliant on the costs of a few added instructions? Or do you have another suggestion how I should go about it? Best regards Norman -- Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske Genode Labs http://www.genode-labs.com · http://genode.org Genode Labs GmbH · Amtsgericht Dresden · HRB 28424 · Sitz Dresden Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske, Christian Helmuth

4 7

haskell on sel4
by Tim Newsham 05 Dec '15

05 Dec '15

I just noticed the web page says "we have Haskell sort-of running on seL4 (thanks or friends from Galois for their help), should be released in the near future" This is great news. Are you able to share any details such as when any of this will be public, what the porting strategy was (is this similar to HalVM?), what dependencies haskell compiled code requires, if there are sel4 bindings, etc? Tim

3 4

Wandboard Port
by Robert Kaiser 30 Jul '15

30 Jul '15

Hello, in an attempt to familiarize myself with the seL4 code, I am trying to "port" it to the Wandboard (see www.wandboard.org). This should be an easy task for a beginner (thought I) since the board is very similar to the SabeLite, and seL4 is already running well on that board. I have access to a SabreLite and a Wandboard Quad, both (according to U-boot) have the same revision of the iMX6 SoC installed. Differences between the Sabre and the Wand I have noticed so far are: - 2GB of RAM from (0x10000000 to 0x90000000) on the Wand (Sabrelite has 1GB) - Wand uses UART1 for debug output, Sabrelite: UART2 I compiled an sel4test project where I adapted the UART port in kernel/include/plat/imx6/plat/machine/devices.h and elfloader/src/arch-arm/plat-imx6/platform.h and the RAM size in kernel src/plat/imx6/machine/hardware.c. When I boot this system, I get: Jumping to kernel-image entry point... Bootstrapping kernel Caught cap fault in send phase at address 0x0 while trying to handle: vm fault on data at address 0x9f11c2e0 with status 0x1c06 in thread 0xffdfad00 at address 0x13294 (Needless to say, "all is well in the universe" on the SabreLite... ) What is not shown here are a ton of other debug messages which I have added to convince myself that kernel initialization completes as expected. The crash seems to happen upon entry into user code. The address 0x13294 is the virtual address of the entry point: $ nm build/arm/imx6/sel4test-driver/sel4test-driver.bin | grep 13294 00013294 T _sel4_start I suspect that this fault happens on opcode fetch, because the user code is not properly mapped when invoked. Does "status 0x1c06" confirm this? If so, *should* the code be mapped at this point or are these mappings expected to be installed "on demand", i.e. through page fault handling? Thanks for any help... Robert -- Robert Kaiser Computer Engineering RheinMain University of Applied Sciences

3 14

Try two for libsel4 not having a dependency on libc
by Wink Saville 04 Jul '15

04 Jul '15

Here <https://github.com/winksaville/sel4-min-sel4/tree/new-libs> is a different approach for removing the libc dependency, it seemed like people thought libsel4 was to big and that as part of the effort of breaking the dependency it should be made smaller. Basically libsel4 does nothing expect satisfy dependency needed for the kernel for some xml files. And I've broken libsel4 into basically 8 other libraries. see here <https://github.com/winksaville/sel4-min-sel4/tree/new-libs/libs>. This maybe taking things to far, but it does mean people can use only what they need, which I like. The smallest example is app/min-hw which only uses libsel4_gen, libsel4_startup. libsel4_bootinfo and libsel4_putchar. At the other extreme apps/test-newlibs uses everything. Anyway other organizations are certainly possible. Currently there is at least one known problem, I modified bitfield_gen.py so types_gen.h has no asserts since at the moment the kernel uses assert and userspace is libsel4_assert. We could either do something like I've done and remove them or change the kernel to use libsel4_assert or something else. Anyway, before creating a pull request I'd like to know what people think. -- Wink

4 12

Make seL4/libsel4 not depend upon libc
by Wink Saville 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

I noticed that seL4/libsel4 was dependent upon libc and so I created a patch ( https://github.com/winksaville/seL4/commit/fc91a1f68c054fdb41aaa42a7b56a80f…) which removes the dependency. If there is interest I can submit a pull request, and of course will make any changes deemed necessary to make it suitable for acceptance. Please advise, Wink

6 11

How to edit RefOS libs c file
by ぷ风过无痕?? 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

Hi, I am using RefOS to develop a small applicaiton(interprocess comunicaion).I need to edit some c files in RefOS/libs/librefos directory,But comments say that do not edit these files,these files were generated by CIDL.CIDL is a simple C IDL compiler which is made to save the trouble of manually implementing RPC interface stubs to marshal C style arguments and return value. It uses a simple XML-based IDL language. I search on the google，but just got some introduction. So where can I got some useful infomation about CIDL? Can you recommend some books or websites? ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "devel-request";<devel-request(a)sel4.systems>; Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2015 10:00 AM To: "devel"<devel(a)sel4.systems>; Subject: Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 11 Send Devel mailing list submissions to devel(a)sel4.systems To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to devel-request(a)sel4.systems You can reach the person managing the list at devel-owner(a)sel4.systems When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 10_Bare Metal support for GCC (da Tyga) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:26:46 +1000 From: da Tyga <cyberfonic(a)gmail.com> To: devel(a)sel4.systems Subject: Re: [seL4] Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 10_Bare Metal support for GCC Message-ID: <CALj3Nd3+CFFQF41BOwW+-bwFNOEZS9HyVLHDwVssTyMAcsU3ig(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Hi Yuxin, I don't think you need to modify GCC, it is the compiler that you can use to generate required executables. Making changes to it is a massive undertaking. Instead of trying to reinvent stuff that has already been done, you really should read the Genode documentation and download and read the source code referenced by Norman Feske's suggestions. >From my reading of the Genode documents and source code, I would expect that you would find a considerable amount of code that you could you re-purpose for your specific requirements. Cheers, Tyga > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 22:46:40 +0800 > From: Yuxin Ren <ryx(a)gwmail.gwu.edu> > To: Norman Feske <norman.feske(a)genode-labs.com> > Cc: "devel(a)sel4.systems" <devel(a)sel4.systems> > Subject: Re: [seL4] Does sel4 support c++ > Message-ID: > <CAAKbDrcbyh0YV+nHzhziiiXavn-= > P_tW5bS2LUfPzHcBF-iMKg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thank you all! > > If modifying the tool chain is the easiest way, I want to try it. > But I definitely want to avoid creating the tool chain from "bare metal". > I still prefer to reuse the existing tool chain like gcc > with minimal modification. > > Could you give me some guidance how to create a custom tool chain, which > part I need to modify? > I am not familiar with gcc. So if I have to modify gcc, where can I get > more information or documentation? > > Thanks a lot!! > Yuxin > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Norman Feske < > norman.feske(a)genode-labs.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > The easiest approach is possibly to create a custom tool chain, and > port > > > the GCC C++ library that way. I know the people behind Genode did some > > > of this (http://genode.org/download/tool-chain), although I'm not sure > > > how much of the C++ standard library they actually support. > > > > more in-depth information about Genode's tool chain are provided by > > Section 7.2 of the documentation [1]. In short, the tool chain is a > > "bare metal" tool chain that does not depend on a C library, yet it > > still supports C++ (including exceptions and runtime type information). > > > > On Genode, the libc and STL (aka stdcxx) can be used optionally whereas > > the STL depends on the libc. The libc is based on FreeBSD's libc. The > > STL is GCC's version. Both libraries are available via Genode's ports > > mechanism. > > > > That said, as both the libc and stdcxx are shared libraries, they cannot > > be used on the seL4 version of Genode as of now. Shared libraries don't > > work on seL4 (at least on x86_32) because the system-call bindings > > cannot be compiled with -fPIC. > > > > [1] http://genode.org/documentation/genode-foundations-15-05.pdf > > > > Best regards > > Norman > > > > -- > > Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske > > Genode Labs > > > > http://www.genode-labs.com ? http://genode.org > > > > Genode Labs GmbH ? Amtsgericht Dresden ? HRB 28424 ? Sitz Dresden > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske, Christian Helmuth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > Devel(a)sel4.systems > > https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://sel4.systems/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150619/5b4ce704/attachmen… > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)sel4.systems > https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 10 > ************************************* > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://sel4.systems/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150620/c72cfc07/attachmen…> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel ------------------------------ End of Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 11 *************************************

4 3

Re: [seL4] Devel Digest, Vol 13, Issue 10_Bare Metal support for GCC
by da Tyga 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

> > > Hi Yuxin, I don't think you need to modify GCC, it is the compiler that you can use to generate required executables. Making changes to it is a massive undertaking. Instead of trying to reinvent stuff that has already been done, you really should read the Genode documentation and download and read the source code referenced by Norman Feske's suggestions. >From my reading of the Genode documents and source code, I would expect that you would find a considerable amount of code that you could you re-purpose for your specific requirements. Cheers, Tyga > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 22:46:40 +0800 > From: Yuxin Ren <ryx(a)gwmail.gwu.edu> > To: Norman Feske <norman.feske(a)genode-labs.com> > Cc: "devel(a)sel4.systems" <devel(a)sel4.systems> > Subject: Re: [seL4] Does sel4 support c++ > Message-ID: > <CAAKbDrcbyh0YV+nHzhziiiXavn-= > P_tW5bS2LUfPzHcBF-iMKg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thank you all! > > If modifying the tool chain is the easiest way, I want to try it. > But I definitely want to avoid creating the tool chain from "bare metal". > I still prefer to reuse the existing tool chain like gcc > with minimal modification. > > Could you give me some guidance how to create a custom tool chain, which > part I need to modify? > I am not familiar with gcc. So if I have to modify gcc, where can I get > more information or documentation? > > Thanks a lot!! > Yuxin > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Norman Feske < > norman.feske(a)genode-labs.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > The easiest approach is possibly to create a custom tool chain, and > port > > > the GCC C++ library that way. I know the people behind Genode did some > > > of this (http://genode.org/download/tool-chain), although I'm not sure > > > how much of the C++ standard library they actually support. > > > > more in-depth information about Genode's tool chain are provided by > > Section 7.2 of the documentation [1]. In short, the tool chain is a > > "bare metal" tool chain that does not depend on a C library, yet it > > still supports C++ (including exceptions and runtime type information). > > > > On Genode, the libc and STL (aka stdcxx) can be used optionally whereas > > the STL depends on the libc. The libc is based on FreeBSD's libc. The > > STL is GCC's version. Both libraries are available via Genode's ports > > mechanism. > > > > That said, as both the libc and stdcxx are shared libraries, they cannot > > be used on the seL4 version of Genode as of now. Shared libraries don't > > work on seL4 (at least on x86_32) because the system-call bindings > > cannot be compiled with -fPIC. > > > > [1] http://genode.org/documentation/genode-foundations-15-05.pdf > > > > Best regards > > Norman > > > > -- > > Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske > > Genode Labs > > > > http://www.genode-labs.com ? http://genode.org > > > > Genode Labs GmbH ? Amtsgericht Dresden ? HRB 28424 ? Sitz Dresden > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske, Christian Helmuth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > Devel(a)sel4.systems > > https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel > > >

2 1

Does sel4 support c++
by Yuxin Ren 19 Jun '15

19 Jun '15

Hi, Can I run C++ programs on sel4? I am not familiar with programming language. I do not know the relationship between the OS and the C++ language. In order to run C++, does the OS need to provide some support or what user level library are needed? Thanks a lot. Yuxin

4 6

Virtualization extensions
by Nick Betteridge 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

Hi I'm very interested in working with the virtualization extensions on sel4 - is there any rough timeline for when these will be available. Thanks Nick

1 0

high-availability system should have these software services
by XilongPei(裴喜龙) 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

Hi, In general, a high-availability system should have the following software services http://electronicdesign.com/boards/high-availability-rtoss-deliver-five-nine s-reliability : - Heartbeat support for each server and each application. - Event management capability for change notification. - Alarm management for error handling. - Transactions capability for check-pointing and rollback/restart. - Clustering for server management and applications links. - Reliable storage support for RAIDs and for journaling file systems. I want to develop a high-availability system on seL4, can anyone give me some suggestions? QNX has high availability support http://www.qnx.com/developers/docs/6.3.0SP3/neutrino/sys_arch/ham.html , can we learn something from them? Xilong Pei Tongji University 2015/6/11

6 7

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

Devel June 2015