September 2017 - Devel - lists.sel4.systems

seL4 test on x86
by Yevgeny Lavrov 30 Jan '25

30 Jan '25

Hello, I'm new to seL4 and I'm just doing it for learning purpose. I'm trying to run seL4 test suite or simple hello world task from seL4 tutorials on the real hardware. So far I had no problems compiling seL4 test suite and running via QEMU for both x32 and x64 platforms. However, when I try to run it on the actual hardware following Running on real hardware tutorial for x86 I end up with no output at all and no error msgs that can give me a clue on where something went wrong. After compiling seL4test for x86, I ended up with two images in sel4_dir/images/ folder. Copied them over to /boot/sel4/ folder and created a new GRUB2 entry that looks like this menuentry “seL4 test suite” --class os { load video insmod gzio insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root=’(hd0,msdos5)’ multiboot /boot/sel4/kernel-ia32-pc99 module /boot/sel4/sel4test-driver-image-ia32-pc99 } update grub, restart and select the new entry from GRUB menu. I end up with blinking cursor on the top-left side of the screen. Please advise.

4 3

Questions about Memory Management in seL4
by Daniel Wang 19 May '23

19 May '23

Hi all, Sorry to bother, I have some basic questions about seL4 memory management. Can someone help me? 1. where is the kernel’s address space? I know there are basically three methods: a) separate virtual address space, e.g. through changing page tables on entry into privileged mode to access b) physical space, e.g. through disable automatic hardware translation of virtual addresses on entry into privilege mode c) privilege region in each process’s virtual address space, e.g. through page table to map kernel address into use-mode process. My question is which of this is being used by seL4 microkernel? 2. Objects like CSpace, VSpace, CNode, TCB, Endpoint, etc. are called kernel objects, but it seems all dynamically allocated in thread running/creating time. Are those objects (e.g. Figure 3.3 in seL4 manual) in kernel space or in user space? 3. I read that after the kernel boot up, it passes all resources, untyped memory to the first thread. Are those untyped memory physical memory or virtual memory in a single page? The reason I ask is I’m learning the code of the UNSW AOS project (two of the assignment projects are implementing frame and papers). I’m confused that before the implementation of frames and pages what kind of memory is passed to the the first thread? I saw int AOS project, it uses ut_table_init(), ut_steal_mem(), I wonder what kind of memory it operates on? Thanks -Dan

5 4

UEFI support for x86
by Edward Sandberg 05 Dec '17

05 Dec '17

Is there a plan to add UEFI support in seL4 for x86 hardware in the near future? Newer x86 boards are frequently UEFI only. It is possible to get around the lack of UEFI support, as I have done with the UP board: https://up-community.org/wiki/Hardware_Specification but I am hitting problems which I will detail below. When I compile using ia32_debug_xml_defconfig and boot using the resulting images the board fails to find the RSDP location. To fix this I had to modify the source code a bit: * seL4test/projects/util_libs/libplatsupport/src/plat/pc99/acpi/acpi.h + #define UPBOARD_RSDP 0x5B161000 * seL4test/projects/util_libs/libplatsupport/src/plat/pc99/acpi/acpi.c - acpi->rsdp = acpi_sig_search(acpi, ACPI_SIG_RSDP, strlen(ACPI_SIG_RSDP), - (void *) BIOS_PADDR_START, (void *) BIOS_PADDR_END); + acpi->rsdp = (void *)UPBOARD_RSDP; * seL4test/kernel/src/plat/pc99/machine/acpi.c - for (addr = (char*)BIOS_PADDR_START; addr < (char*)BIOS_PADDR_END; addr += 16) { + for (addr = (char*)0; addr < (char*)PPTR_BASE; addr += 16) { It would be handy to have this as a kernel parameter to cover cases where it is not successfully discovered automatically. With these changes I can boot the board and several tests pass but then I get stuck on INTERRUPT0001 (Test interrupts with timer). I don't get a test failure or an error the board just sits and makes no more progress. Someone had that test fail in this post: https://sel4.systems/pipermail/devel/2017-February/001328.html and the first recommendation was to check if the irq of the timer was correctly found. I booted the board into linux to find the correct irq which was listed as 0 in /proc/interupts. I added a printf to handleInterrupt in the kernel source, recompiled and when I booted seL4 I found that the irq reported to handleInterrupt is 125 (which sel4 reports as the max interrupt value) every time that function is called. Adding this printf also showed me that when the test hangs the board hasn't crashed or locked up as calls to handleInterrupt are made continuously. At this point I noticed that before any tests started to run several ACPI tables are not recognized: Parsing ACPI tables Skipping table FPDTD, unknown Skipping table FIDT<9c>, unknown Skipping table UEFIB, unknown Skipping table TPM24, unknown Skipping table LPIT^D^A, unknown Skipping table BCFG9^A, unknown Skipping table PRAM0, unknown Skipping table CSRTL^A, unknown Skipping table BCFG9^A, unknown Skipping table OEM0<84>, unknown Skipping table OEM1@, unknown Skipping table PIDVÜ, unknown Skipping table RSCI,, unknown Skipping table WDAT^D^A, unknown Warning: skipping table ACPI XSDT Maybe one or more of those tables needs to be loaded to handle interrupts properly. The LPIT table is conspicuous in the case of the timer test but I think other tests are likely to depend on the other tables. Any suggestions about porting this type of hardware? -- Edward Sandberg Adventium Labs 111 3rd Avenue S. Suite #100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 ed.sandberg(a)adventiumlabs.com

4 10

SMP on Zynq7000 zc702
by Jesse Millwood 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

Hello, I realize that the only officially supported SMP platform is the i.mx6 but I did see some code on 6.0 to master for SMP and the zynq7000 so I am trying to test out some SMP functionality on my zc702 board. I am wondering if anyone has this working because my system is failing when compiling from master and the 6.0 and compatible tags. My second core seems to be coming up but the system ultimately fails and prints out: Bo ot nKgE RaNlEl L fDinAiTsAh eAdBO, RdT!r ppFaeud lttio nugs eirn stspraucctei o n: 0xe001d1b0 o FAR: 0xfffffff8 DFSR: 0x807 halting... Kernel entry via Syscall, number: 1, Call Cap type: 1, Invocation tag: 37 Which seems to be "Booting all finished, dropped to user space" from core0 and "KERNEL DATA ABORT!" from core1. The "0xe001d1b0" seems to be the label of the "idle_thread" function. While stepping through via JTAG, I have verified that core1 gets through "init_kernel" and then enters "restore_user_context" at some point in "restore_user_context" the fault registers as shown in the printed output are set. I think it is either in the c_exit_hook in restore_user_context or after the program branches to "0xFFF0010" which is "ldr pc,0xFFFF0030". This branches to the "arm_data_abort_exception" label, which goes to "kernel_data_fault" label and then to "kernel data abort". I'm having trouble exactly pin pointing where the fault occurs but it seems to be close to there. Has anyone had similar issues with SMP? It seems to get fairly far without setting the fault registers. I have tried to step through the execution over JTAG and here are some of my (verbose) notes | CORE0 Address | Core0 Function | Core0 Instruction | CORE1 Address | Core1 Function | Core1 Instruction | DFSR | DFAR | Note | |---------------+-----------------------------+------------------------+---------------+------------------------------------+----------------------+------------+------------+------| | 0x10000000 | label: start | =cpsid aif= | 0xFFFFFF34 | | =mvn r0,#0x0f= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | | | 0x10003A2C | call: platform_init | =bl -x10003DD8= | 0xFFFFFF30 | | =wfe= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | | | 0x10003ACC | call: smp_boot | =bl 0x100039FC= | 0xFFFFFF34 | | =mvn r0,#0x0f= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | | | 0x10003ADO | ret: smp_boot | =bl 0x10005C54= | 0x10000020 | in: non_boot_core | =orr r0,r0,#0x40= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 2 | | 0x10003ADC | =if(is_hyp_mode())= | =beq 0x10003AF0= | 0x10002200 | label: arm_disable_dcaches | =push {r14}= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | | | 0x10003AFC | call: arm_enable_mmu | =bl 0x10002174= | 0xE0006190 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1 | | 0xE0001D70 | label: init_kernel | =push {r11,r14}= | 0xE0001680 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1 | | 0xE0001814 | label: try_init_kernel | =push {r11,r14}= | 0xE0001690 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1 | | 0xE0001B80 | call: create_initial_thread | =str r0, [r11,#-0x14]= | 0xE0001680 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1 | | 0xE0001C48 | call: SMP_COND_STATEMENT | =bl 0xE0003C20= | 0xE0001680 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1, 3 | | 0xE0001C4C | call: SMP_COND_STATEMENT | =bl 0xE00017D8= | 0xE0001680 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary_core | =beq 0xE0001680= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 1, 4 | | 0xE0001C50 | NODE_LOCK_SYS | =bl 0xE0019280= | 0xE0019288 | in: getCurrentCPUIndex | =sub r13,r13,#0x8= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 5 | | 0xE0001D1C | call: arch_pause | =bl 0xE0019DB0= | 0xE0019290 | in: getCurrentCPUIndex | =str r0,[r11,#-0x8]= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 6 | | 0xE0001D40 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =uxtb r3,r3= | 0xE00037F4 | in: init_core_state | =pop {r4,r11,pc}= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | | | 0xE0001D20 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =mov r2,#0xE800= | 0xE0003754 | in: init_core_state | =movw r2,#0xE8E0= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 7 | | 0xE0001D40 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =uxtb r3,r3= | 0xE00017C4 | in: try_init_kernel_secondary | =mov r3,#0x1= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 8 | | 0xE0001D40 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =uxtb r3,r3= | 0xE002A06C | in: schedule | =push {r11,r14}= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 9 | | 0xE0001D40 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =uxtb r3,r3= | 0xE002979C | in: activateThread | =push {r11, r14}= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 10 | | 0xE0001D40 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =uxtb r3,r3= | 0xE001D24C | label: Arch_activateIdleThread | =push {r11}= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 11 | | 0xE0001D38 | in: clh_lock_acquire | =ldr r3,[r3,#0x4]= | 0xE0000054 | in: start | =b 0xE001CEC8= | 0x00000000 | 0x00005000 | 12 | Notes 1. Core1 is in a =while (!node_boot_lock)= loop 2. In =smp_boot=, CORE1 changes after =init_cpus= (branch location: ZSR:10003A08) - In =smp_boot=, =boot_cpus= is called - This sets the =CPU_JUMP_PTR= =*((volatile uint32_t*)CPU_JUMP_PTR) = (uint32_t)entry;= - calls =dsb= (data synchronization barrier) - After this call, CPU1 goes to =FFFFFF2C: dsb sy= - And then =sev= - After this call, CPU1 goes to the =non_boot_core= label - SEV - SEV causes an event to be signaled to all cores within a multiprocessor system. If SEV is implemented, WFE must also be implemented. - WFE - If the Event Register is not set, WFE suspends execution until one of the following events occurs: - an IRQ interrupt, unless masked by the CPSR I-bit - an FIQ interrupt, unless masked by the CPSR F-bit - an Imprecise Data abort, unless masked by the CPSR A-bit - a Debug Entry request, if Debug is enabled - an Event signaled by another processor using the SEV instruction. - If the Event Register is set, WFE clears it and returns immediately. - If WFE is implemented, SEV must also be implemented. - After CPU0 executes =arm_enable_mmu()= from the =main= function - by the end of =smp_boot= core1 is just starting =non_boot_main= 3. The =SMP_COND_STATEMENT= is calling =clh_lock_init= 4. The =SMP_COND_STATEMENT= is calling =release_secondary_cpus= 5. right after Core0 returned from releasing secondary cpus - First time Core1 has exited the loop - Core1's stack is - =getCurrentCPUINdex= - =init_core_state= - =try_init_kernel_secondary_core= - =init_kernel= 6. Core0 is in a =while(big_kernel_lock.node_owners[cpu].next->value ! = CLHState_Granted)= - Core0 is in a static inline function =clh_lock_acquire= in =try_init_kernel= - Core1 is in =getCurrentCPUIndex= but being called from =tcbDebugAppend= - =tcbDebugAppend= is being called from a =for= loop in =init_core_state= 7. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 is in "init_core_state" and has exited the for loop that called =tcbDebugAppend(NODE_STATE_ON_CORE(ksIdleThread, i))= 8. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 has returned to =try_init_kernel_secondary_core= from =init_core_state= and is at the end of the function 9. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 has entered the =init_kernel= call and then the =schedule= function. 10. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 has entered the =activateThread= call after =schedule= in =init_kernel= 11. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 seems to have dropped into the =case ThreadState_IdleThreadState:= case when switching on =switch (thread_state_get_tsType(NODE_STATE(ksCurThread)->tcbState))= - This was in =activateThread= 12. Core0 is still in the previously mentioned while loop - Core1 has exited =init_kernel= and is now branching to =restore_user_context= To test everything out I am using the "camkes-sols-master" manifest and building the "CAmkES Hello World application with events and dataports". The changes I made are * I edited the top level CAmkES file to set the affinity for two separate cores. * Upped the Max Number of CPU nodes to 2 The rest of the config is pretty standard. I have it attached to this message. The FSBL and ps7_init script I use are the standard ones created for the zc702 from the 2017.2 version of the Xilinx XSDK. I am booting from jtag and first run the ps7_init script and then flash the fsbl and then the "capdl-loader-experimental-image-arm-zynq7000" that was built. I am wondering if anyone is using a modified fsbl or ps7_init that does something else, if there is config value that I missed, or if it is still in development? If it is still in development I'd like to work with whoever is Thanks, Jesse Millwood

3 4

Integer overflow bug in capdl-loader
by Jeff Kubascik 30 Sep '17

30 Sep '17

Hello, I am working with seL4 7.0.0 on the zynq7000 platform. I have come across a bug that occurs when a device physical memory region includes the highest address, i.e. where the memory region ends at 0xFFFFFFFF on 32 bit systems. When I create a CAmkES component that uses the highest address, I see the following error. ELF-loader started on CPU: ARM Ltd. Cortex-A9 r3p0 paddr=[10000000..100ac81f] ELF-loading image 'kernel' paddr=[0..32fff] vaddr=[e0000000..e0032fff] virt_entry=e0000000 ELF-loading image 'capdl-loader-experimental' paddr=[33000..1aefff] vaddr=[8000..183fff] virt_entry=befc Enabling MMU and paging Bootstrapping kernel Booting all finished, dropped to user space <<seL4(CPU 0) [decodeUntypedInvocation/210 T0xffdfd100 "rootserver" @8fa8]: Untyped Retype: Insufficient memory (1 * 4096 bytes needed, 0 bytes available).>> Warning: using printf before serial is set up. This only works as your printf is backed by seL4_Debug_PutChar() [Err seL4_NotEnoughMemory]: I have traced this problem to an integer overflow bug in the capdl-loader. The patch below shows how I have addressed this error. >From 22c9dd76a31713c98710830c2ea865a4e5d8a078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Kubascik <jeff.kubascik(a)dornerworks.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:52:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed integer overflow bug in capdl-loader that occurs when a device physical memory region ends at 0xFFFFFFFF --- capdl-loader-app/src/main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/capdl-loader-app/src/main.c b/capdl-loader-app/src/main.c index 34eedb0..305da2a 100644 --- a/capdl-loader-app/src/main.c +++ b/capdl-loader-app/src/main.c @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static int find_device_object(void *paddr, seL4_Word type, int size_bits, seL4_C /* Assume we are allocating from a device untyped. Do a linear search for it */ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < bootinfo->untyped.end - bootinfo->untyped.start; i++) { if (bootinfo->untypedList[i].paddr <= (uintptr_t)paddr && - bootinfo->untypedList[i].paddr + BIT(bootinfo->untypedList[i].sizeBits) >= (uintptr_t)paddr + BIT(size_bits)) { + bootinfo->untypedList[i].paddr + BIT(bootinfo->untypedList[i].sizeBits) - 1 >= (uintptr_t)paddr + BIT(size_bits) - 1) { /* just allocate objects until we get the one we want. To do this * correctly we cannot just destroy the cap we allocate, since * if it's the only frame from the untyped this will reset the -- 2.7.4 I have added a -1 to the end address calculations to fix the edge case when bootinfo->untypedList[i].paddr + BIT(bootinfo->untypedList[i].sizeBits) is equal to 0x100000000, an integer overflow. The current statement is comparing the address of the next byte past the end of the memory region. My change is comparing the address of the last byte in the memory region. I have tested this fix on the zynq7000 and it works. However, I am not too familiar with the capdl-loader. Are there any problems with this fix that I have not considered? Thanks, Jeff Kubascik

2 2

ARM 64-bit Support in seL4
by keith＠matellio.com 29 Sep '17

29 Sep '17

Not sure if this is the best place to post this question but I noticed on the seL4 roadmap page on the website that 64-bit support for ARM is due out at the end of 3Q2017. Is that correct, and if so, can someone give me some hints of where to look for it in the repository?

4 3

sel4 on QEMU
by ashokk＠spanidea.com 28 Sep '17

28 Sep '17

Hi, I am trying to run sel4 on QEMU, i am following this steps(https://wiki.sel4.systems/Hardware/Qemu) make clean make optiplex9020_defconfig make silentoldconfig make but while doing make i am getting following error.. /home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c: In function ‘get_breakpoint_format’:/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:130:27: error: ‘seL4_InstructionBreakpoint’ undeclared (first use in this function) *break_type = seL4_InstructionBreakpoint; ^/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:130:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:131:19: error: ‘seL4_BreakOnRead’ undeclared (first use in this function) *rw = seL4_BreakOnRead; ^/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:135:27: error: ‘seL4_DataBreakpoint’ undeclared (first use in this function) *break_type = seL4_DataBreakpoint; ^/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:136:19: error: ‘seL4_BreakOnWrite’ undeclared (first use in this function) *rw = seL4_BreakOnWrite; ^/home/arun/test_default/libs/libsel4camkes/src/gdb_server/gdb.c:146:19: error: ‘seL4_BreakOnReadWrite’ undeclared (first use in this function) *rw = seL4_BreakOnReadWrite; ^make[1]: *** [src/gdb_server/gdb.o] Error 1make: *** [libsel4camkes] Error 2 can you please give any solution to solve these errors.. RegardsAshok

2 2

Sel4 compilation error for RasperryPi-3
by ashokk＠spanidea.com 27 Sep '17

27 Sep '17

Hi I am trying to cross-compile sel4 for rasperry-pi-3. i am executing following command on sel4 kernel source to cross-compile. TOOLPREFIX=arm-linux-gnueabi- ARCH=arm PLAT=bcm2837 ARMV=armv8-a CPU=cortex-a53 i am getting following error while doing make [BF_GEN] arch/object/structures_gen.h [BF_GEN] plat/machine/hardware_gen.h [BF_GEN] 32/mode/api/shared_types_gen.h [CPP] src/arch/arm/armv/armv8-a/32/machine_asm.s_pp In file included from src/arch/arm/armv/armv8-a/32/machine_asm.S:11:0: ./include/config.h:17:22: fatal error: autoconf.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make: *** [src/arch/arm/armv/armv8-a/32/machine_asm.s_pp] Error 1 rm 32/mode/api/shared_types_gen.h plat/machine/hardware_gen.h arch/object/structures_gen.h is there any solution for this... RegardsAshok

2 1

General question about software
by Raymond Jennings 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

So, I know that at a basic level, a block device driver would probably need I/O permissions, and I'm guessing that it would be handling requests from a file system driver. Is that basically how the seL4 software ecosystem is laid out? What's typical for how "software in the wild" is actually organized and layered on top of the microkernel? I only know about seL4 from a theoretical standpoint, read the manual and stuff, and mostly familiar with the actual kernel, but I'm a complete noob when it comes to actual software.

3 2

Raspberry pi 3 compilation error
by Prathamesh Rahate 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hi, I am trying to cross-compile seL4 for rapsberry pi 3 using steps mentioned hereseL4 on the Raspberry Pi 3 | | | seL4 on the Raspberry Pi 3 | | | I am getting following error while compiling, are there any patches available to fix this error: [STAGE] libsel4sync.a[libs/libsel4sync] done.[apps/sel4test-tests] building... [HEADERS] [STAGE] test_init_data.h [STAGE] arch/* [STAGE] arch_frame_type.h [STAGE] autoconf.h [CC] src/helpers.o [CC] src/main.o [CC] src/tests/multicore.o [CC] src/tests/preempt.o [CC] src/tests/serial_server.o [CC] src/tests/breakpoints.o [CC] src/tests/scheduler.o [CC] src/tests/pagetables.o [CC] src/tests/inc_untyped.o [CC] src/tests/interrupt.o [CC] src/tests/sync.o [CC] src/tests/iopt.o [CC] src/tests/ioports.o [CC] src/tests/vspace.o [CC] src/tests/ipc.o [CC] src/tests/schedcontext.o [CC] src/tests/fpu.o [CC] src/tests/ept.o [CC] src/tests/trivial.o [CC] src/tests/binding.o [CC] src/tests/cnodeops.o [CC] src/tests/threads.o [CC] src/tests/cspace.o [CC] src/tests/regressions.o/tmp/cc7e2jo9.s: Assembler messages:/tmp/cc7e2jo9.s:120: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `ldrex r2,[r3]'/tmp/cc7e2jo9.s:154: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `strex r0,r3,[r2]'make[1]: *** [src/tests/regressions.o] Error 1make: *** [sel4test-tests] Error 2user@user-Lenovo:~/seL4test$ Thanks,Prathamesh

2 1