- Devel - lists.sel4.systems

Running vm_multi app on qemu-arm-virt platform, udhcpc can not return
by ybbekele＠aggies.ncat.edu 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Hi, I tried to build vm_multi for qemu-arm-virt using the procedures in this link https://docs.sel4.systems/projects/camkes-vm/. After building, I used the generated simulation file to do ./simulate in my build directory. After displaying 'welcome to buildroot', the console always prints the log "udhcpc: sending discover",which indicates udhcpc can not return. The related log was shown below: Starting syslogd: OK Starting syslogd: OK Starting syslogd: OK Starting klogd: OK Starting klogd: OK Starting klogd: OK Running sysctl: OK Running sysctl: OK Running sysctl: OK Initializing random number generator... [ 7.195263] random: dd: uninitialized urandom read (512 bytes read) done. Initializing random number generator... [ 7.315113] random: dd: uninitialized urandom read (512 bytes read) done. Initializing random number generator... [ 7.300770] random: dd: uninitialized urandom read (512 bytes read) done. Starting network: OK Starting network: OK Starting network: OK udhcpc: started, v1.31.0 udhcpc: started, v1.31.0 ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device [ 9.077855] random: mktemp: uninitialized urandom read (6 bytes read) [ 9.177878] random: mktemp: uninitialized urandom read (6 bytes read) Welcome to Buildroot udhcpc: sending discover udhcpc: sending discover udhcpc: sending discover udhcpc: sending discover As the simulation process progresses there was an error: _utspace_split_alloc@split.c:266 Failed to find any untyped capable of creating an object at address 0x10080000 alloc_vm_device_cap@main.c:938 Grabbing the entire cap for device memory alloc_vm_device_cap@main.c:941 Failed to grab the entire cap My question is: 1. Is the two things have dependencies (The error and the hang at booting the system up)? 2. How can this issue be solved? 3. Is this issue related to the TimeServer component being imported to Qemu (as this is indicated as a requirement to run multi_vm on qemu-arm-virt)? Thank you for your time

1 0

Why vppi is sent from kernel to vmm by fault endpoint but not by notification ?
by wtliang785 21 Apr '22

21 Apr '22

hello devel, Why vppi , such as vtimer interrupt to guest, is sent from kernel to vmm by fault endpoint but not by notification? I see that spi to guest is sent from kernel to vmm by notification. thank you.

1 0

Reminder seL4 developer hangout/video call
by Gerwin Klein 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Hi all A friendly reminder that the seL4 developer hangout is on again this week: Tue, Apr 19, 10pm (UTC) * Sydney: Wed, Apr 20, 8am * Central Europe: Wed, Apr 20, 12 midnight * US Pacific Time: Tue, Apr 19, 3pm Zoom link: https://unsw.zoom.us/j/82640784431 Cheers, Gerwin

1 0

Re: Combatting spam on this list
by Isaac Beckett 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

Thanks Peter! In my experience posts like that, linking to pornographic websites, are not made by humans anyway, but rather by bots. I don’t think this will effect humans too much except at the very beginning. It may make sense to implement a different captcha, as often the developers of those bots can outsource solving common captcha providers to underpaid humans. Using an uncommon or home-grown captcha solution will make it less likely that bots will be able to get around them using that method. And attacks like these aren’t targeted, usually, so I doubt the bot writers will adapt for one specific mailing list. That will stop bots from signing up in the first place, hopefully. We could also maybe report abuse of free email services like Gmail or Hotmail or similar in a semi-automated fashion. Would not surprise me if there is some sort of API for that. But on the other hand with the way those companies work it could be a waste of time and effort, since they might not do anything. And it may also make sense to keep track of which domains non-malicious users are sending email from. That way we can ban entire domains without worrying about getting rid of legitimate users unintentionally. For example, a small webmail service that we may not realize is a public email service at first, could be used by both a malicious user and a legitimate one. That way we’re only banning domains controlled by spammers exclusively. There’s lots of resources for this stuff thankfully, you can go on a whole tangent reading about email spam prevention on Wikipedia. I wish you luck with figuring out how to stop this annoying nonsense.

3 2

Unrecognized OPCODE fence.i/csrw
by porter.188＠osu.edu 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

I'm trying to setup a development machine for seL4 work. I would like to use v12.1.0. I setup seL4test-manifest per instructions here https://docs.sel4.systems/Hardware/spike.html repo init -u https://github.com/seL4/sel4test-manifest.git repo sync mkdir cbuild cd cbuild ../init-build.sh -DPLATFORM=spike -DRISCV64=1 # The default cmake wrapper sets up a default configuration for the target platform. # To change individual settings, run `ccmake` and change the configuration # parameters to suit your needs. ninja # If your target binaries can be executed in an emulator/simulator, and if # our build system happens to support that target emulator, then this script # might work for you: ./simulate I used repo init -u https://github.com/seL4/sel4test-manifest.git -b refs/tags/12.1.0 to be sure I got 12.1.0 but it doesn't matter, both branches/tags give the same error when I configure/compile. $ ../init-build.sh -DPLATFORM=spike -DRISCV64=1 -DSIMULATION=1 loading initial cache file /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/sel4test/settings.cmake -- Set platform details from PLATFORM=spike -- KernelPlatform: spike -- Setting from flags KernelSel4Arch: riscv64 -- Found seL4: /mnt/data/sel4test/kernel -- Found GCC with prefix riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -- Found GCC with prefix riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -- The C compiler identification is GNU 10.2.0 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 10.2.0 -- The ASM compiler identification is GNU -- Found assembler: /mnt/data/opt/riscv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working C compiler: /mnt/data/opt/riscv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc - skipped -- Detecting C compile features -- Detecting C compile features - done -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working CXX compiler: /mnt/data/opt/riscv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ - skipped -- Detecting CXX compile features -- Detecting CXX compile features - done -- Found elfloader-tool: /mnt/data/sel4test/tools/seL4/elfloader-tool -- /mnt/data/sel4test/build/kernel/gen_headers/plat/machine/devices_gen.h is out of date. Regenerating... -- CPIO test cpio_reproducible_flag PASSED -- Found musllibc: /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/musllibc -- Found util_libs: /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/util_libs -- Found seL4_libs: /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/seL4_libs -- Found sel4_projects_libs: /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/sel4_projects_libs -- Found sel4runtime: /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/sel4runtime -- Performing Test compiler_arch_test -- Performing Test compiler_arch_test - Success -- libmuslc architecture: 'riscv' (from KernelSel4Arch 'riscv64') -- Detecting cached version of: musllibc -- Found Git: /usr/bin/git (found version "2.25.1") -- Not found cache entry for musllibc - will build from source -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python (found version "2.7.18") CMake Warning (dev) at /home/user/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/cmake/data/share/cmake-3.22/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:438 (message): The package name passed to `find_package_handle_standard_args` (NANOPB) does not match the name of the calling package (Nanopb). This can lead to problems in calling code that expects `find_package` result variables (e.g., `_FOUND`) to follow a certain pattern. Call Stack (most recent call first): /mnt/data/sel4test/tools/nanopb/extra/FindNanopb.cmake:340 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) /mnt/data/sel4test/tools/seL4/cmake-tool/helpers/nanopb.cmake:29 (find_package) /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/sel4_projects_libs/libsel4nanopb/CMakeLists.txt:11 (include) This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. -- Found NANOPB: /mnt/data/sel4test/tools/nanopb -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /mnt/data/sel4test/build user@user-KVM:/mnt/data/sel4test/build$ ninja [42/267] Building ASM object kernel/CMakeFiles/kernel.elf.dir/src/arch/riscv/head.S.obj FAILED: kernel/CMakeFiles/kernel.elf.dir/src/arch/riscv/head.S.obj /usr/bin/ccache /mnt/data/opt/riscv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc --sysroot=/mnt/data/sel4test/build -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/plat/default -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/64 -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/arch/riscv -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/arch/riscv/arch/64 -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/plat/spike -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/include/plat/spike/plat/64 -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/libsel4/include -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/libsel4/arch_include/riscv -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/libsel4/sel4_arch_include/riscv64 -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/libsel4/sel4_plat_include/spike -I/mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/libsel4/mode_include/64 -I/mnt/data/sel4test/build/kernel/gen_config -I/mnt/data/sel4test/build/kernel/autoconf -I/mnt/data/sel4test/build/kernel/gen_headers -I/mnt/data/sel4test/build/kernel/generated -march=rv64imac -mabi=lp64 -D__KERNEL_64__ -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -nostdinc -nostdlib -O2 -DHAVE_AUTOCONF -DDEBUG -g -ggdb -mcmodel=medany -fno-pic -fno-pie -fno-stack-protector -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c99 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wmissing-declarations -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wno-nonnull -ffreestanding -MD -MT kernel/CMakeFiles/kernel.elf.dir/src/arch/riscv/head.S.obj -MF kernel/CMakeFiles/kernel.elf.dir/src/arch/riscv/head.S.obj.d -o kernel/CMakeFiles/kernel.elf.dir/src/arch/riscv/head.S.obj -c /mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/src/arch/riscv/head.S /mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/src/arch/riscv/head.S: Assembler messages: /mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/src/arch/riscv/head.S:24: Error: unrecognized opcode `fence.i' /mnt/data/sel4test/kernel/src/arch/riscv/head.S:31: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrw sscratch,x0' [44/267] Invoking muslc build system /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/musllibc/src/unistd/getcwd.c: In function 'getcwd': cc1: warning: function may return address of local variable [-Wreturn-local-addr] /mnt/data/sel4test/projects/musllibc/src/unistd/getcwd.c:9:7: note: declared here 9 | char tmp[PATH_MAX]; | ^~~ ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. I tried riscv-gcc 10.2.0 and 11.1.0 with the same results. $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc --version riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (gca312387ab1) 10.2.0 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Is there some extension I need to add to get this working? Where do I do that?

2 2

答复: Report "Failed to touch ram region" error using virtio_console when assigned for Arm-VM more than 3G memory
by Han JingLong 韩景龙 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Hi The root cause of this problem has been found, when Guest OS do the virtio console driver probe, if virtqueue's desc addr allocated by alloc_pages_exact() in the setup_vq() function is >= 0x100000000 (it is common when the memory of VM allocated exceeds 3G), at first It will be shifted right 12 bits by Guest OS(turn into a value >= 0x100000), and then use iowrite32(iobase + VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_PFN) to notify Host, after unsigned int type data be shifted left 12 bits by Host, the higest bits 0x1 of virtqueue's desc addr will be lost. I have submitted a PR for the amendment, waiting for the review and merge into the main branch. https://github.com/seL4/seL4_projects_libs/pull/43 BR. Allen 发件人: Han JingLong 韩景龙发送时间: 2022年3月21日 20:27 收件人: 'devel(a)sel4.systems' <devel(a)sel4.systems> 主题: Report "Failed to touch ram region" error using virtio_console when assigned for Arm-VM more than 3G memory Hi I had make virtio_console work well on my environment(armv8, RAM is 8G) based on vm_multi with Linux Guest OS(512M) and Android Guest OS(<= 3G) But I meet an error(vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157<mailto:vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157> Failed to touch ram region: Not registered RAM region) when assign for a VM(Android Guest OS) more than 3G memory. 1. Some logs are added for debugging this issue： +++ b/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul.c @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int emul_io_out(virtio_emul_t *emul, unsigned int offset, unsigned int si assert(size == 4); int queue = emul->virtq.queue; emul->virtq.queue_pfn[queue] = value; + printf("[hjl] queue_size:%d desc:%p\n", emul->virtq.queue_size[queue], (void *)(uintptr_t)(value << 12)); vring_init(&emul->virtq.vring[queue], emul->virtq.queue_size[queue], (void *)(uintptr_t)(value << 12), VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN); break; +++ b/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul_helpers.c @@ -25,10 +25,43 @@ static int write_guest_mem(vm_t *vm, uintptr_t phys, void *vaddr, size_t size, s int vm_guest_write_mem(vm_t *vm, void *data, uintptr_t address, size_t size) { + bool is_inram = false; + vm_mem_t *guest_memory = &vm->mem; + for (int i = 0; i < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; i++) { + if (guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start <= address && + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].size >= address + size) { + /* We are within a ram region*/ + is_inram = true; + } + } + + if (!is_inram) { + printf("[hjl] write mem addr:%p size:0x%lx\n", address, size); + for (int index = 0; index < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; index++) { + printf("[hjl] write mem ram_regions start:%p size:0x%lx\n", guest_memory->ram_regions[index].start, guest_memory->ram_regions[index].size); + } + } + return vm_ram_touch(vm, address, size, write_guest_mem, data); } int vm_guest_read_mem(vm_t *vm, void *data, uintptr_t address, size_t size) { + bool is_inram = false; + vm_mem_t *guest_memory = &vm->mem; + for (int i = 0; i < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; i++) { + if (guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start <= address && + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].size >= address + size) { + /* We are within a ram region*/ + is_inram = true; + } + } + + if (!is_inram) { + printf("[hjl] read mem addr:%p size:0x%lx\n", address, size); + for (int index = 0; index < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; index++) { + printf("[hjl] read mem ram_regions start:%p size:0x%lx\n", guest_memory->ram_regions[index].start, guest_memory->ram_regions[index].size); + } + } return vm_ram_touch(vm, address, size, read_guest_mem, data); } 2. The detailed log is as follows: [hjl] queue_size:128 desc:0x8eb6000 [hjl] queue_size:128 desc:0x8eb8000 [hjl] read mem addr:0x8eb8802 size:0x2 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x80000000 size:0x80000 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x80080000 size:0x17cda00 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8184da00 size:0xa5b2600 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8be00000 size:0x83ae98 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8c63ae98 size:0x29c5168 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8f000000 size:0x26d35 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8f026d35 size:0xc0fd92cb vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157<mailto:vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157> Failed to touch ram region: Not registered RAM region 3. devices.camkes configuration reference is as follows: #define VM1_RAM_BASE 0x80000000 #define VM1_RAM_SIZE 0xD0000000 #define VM1_DTB_ADDR 0x8F000000 //VM1_RAM_BASE + 0xF000000 #define VM1_INITRD_ADDR 0x8BE00000 //VM1_DTB_ADDR - VM1_INITRD_MAX_SIZE vm1.untyped_mmios = [ "0x80000000:28", // RAM "0x90000000:28", // RAM "0xa0000000:28", // RAM "0xb0000000:28", // RAM "0xc0000000:28", // RAM "0xd0000000:28", // RAM "0xe0000000:28", // RAM "0xf0000000:28", // RAM "0x100000000:28", // RAM "0x110000000:28", // RAM "0x120000000:28", // RAM "0x130000000:28", // RAM "0x140000000:28", // RAM /* "0x150000000:28", // RAM "0x160000000:28", // RAM "0x170000000:28", // RAM "0x180000000:28", // RAM "0x190000000:28", // RAM "0x1a0000000:28", // RAM "0x1b0000000:28", // RAM */ ]; 4. Present situation: At present, I tracked and found that When the Guest OS's virtio_console driver do the probe, it created the vring and iowrite to notify VMM of the virtqueue desc 's physical address in setup_vq() /* create the vring */ static void *vring_alloc_queue(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag) { ...... void *queue = alloc_pages_exact(PAGE_ALIGN(size), flag); if (queue) { phys_addr_t phys_addr = virt_to_phys(queue); *dma_handle = (dma_addr_t)phys_addr; /* activate the queue */ iowrite32(virtqueue_get_desc_addr(vq) >> VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_ADDR_SHIFT, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_PFN); I'm very confused why is the physical memory allocated for virtqueue desc not within the effective memory range of VM when assign the memory to it exceeds 3G? BR. Allen 邮件免责申明 Email Disclaimer 本邮件仅供本邮件指定收件人使用，其所载内容可能因含有保密信息或其它原因而不得披露。除本公司及本邮件指定收件人外，任何人不得公开、传播、分发、复制、印刷或使用本邮件之任何部分或其所载之任何内容。如您误收到本邮件，请立即通知本公司，并将原始邮件、附件及其所有复本从系统中删除，切勿使用。 This email is for the use of the designated receivers only，and the content is not allowed to be disclosed due to the confidential information or other reasons. Except for the Company and the designated receivers of this email, no one shall disclose, disseminate, distribute, copy, print or use any part of this email or any content contained therein. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify the Company immediately, and delete the original email, attachments and all copies from the system. Do not use it. 网络通信可能含有计算机病毒或其它缺陷，可能无法准确和/或及时送达其它系统，亦可能受阻而不为本公司或本邮件指定收件人所知。本公司对此类错误或遗漏以及任何因使用本邮件而引致之任何损失概不承担责任。 Network communication may contain computer viruses or other defects, which may not be delivered to other systems accurately and / or in time, or may be blocked by the Company or the designated receivers of this email. The Company shall not be liable for such errors or omissions and for any loss arising from this email. 本邮件所载任何内容仅作为业务层面交流与参考，除非明确说明，本公司不对邮件所载内容之准确性、完整性或公平性等承担任何法律责任。 Any contents contained in this email are only for the purpose of business communication and reference only. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the Company shall not assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the content contained in the email. 本邮件指定收件人应特别注意：本邮件所载任何内容不构成本公司对本邮件指定收件人和/或其所属商业实体的任何要约、要约邀请或承诺，任何权利义务皆以双方签字盖章的书面文件为准。除经本公司以签字盖章的书面文件确认外，收件人和/或其所属商业实体不得以本邮件所载任何内容作为其向本公司主张任何权利或利益的正式依据。 The designated receivers should pay special attention to the fact that nothing contained in this email shall constitute an offer, invitation or acceptance by the Company to the designated receivers of this email and/or its affiliated business entities, and any rights and obligations are subject to the written documents signed and sealed by both parties. Except from the written document signed ,sealed and confirmed by the Company, the receivers and / or its affiliated business entity shall not rely on anything contained in this email as the formal basis for claiming any rights or interests to the Company.

1 0

Combatting spam
by David Barrass 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Hi Peter, Thank you for raising this issue - it is an annoying distraction. The general standard of the list is very high as one would expect and it is a shame to see this kind of behaviour polluting the discussions. I am very happy to have to earn a privilege to post and am happy for anything I post to be moderated. I would welcome any proposition to keep spammers off the list whilst keeping it open but I don't think any solution should impose additional burdens on the moderators. I think that this warrants a bit of thought and will give this some consideration. Your proposal sounds good and I support it. In the meantime thank you and many thanks to all the team who make this happen. I find the work on seL4 very valuable and relevant. best regards to all, David

1 0

Combatting spam on this list
by Peter Chubb 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Hi Folks, We're trying hard to avoid spam coming through this list. In particular we moderate all emails coming from non-members, and only let through on-topic postings. Recently, however, we've had some people join the list, and then posting spam. I'm proposing that the first post a person makes will always be moderated; and we'll turn off the moderation after the first on-topic posting. Anyone who posts spam will have that address marked as discard immediately. This means that *all* next posts will be moderated until I or one of the other moderators lets them through, because I'll be changing the default processing. Comments? I'd rather keep things as open as possible, but spammers are making it hard. Peter C -- Dr Peter Chubb https://trustworthy.systems/ Trustworthy Systems Group CSE, UNSW Core hours: Mon 8am-3pm; Wed: 8am-5pm; Fri 8am-12pm.

1 0

RFC 10
by Gerwin Klein 11 Apr '22

11 Apr '22

This is a last call for comments for RFC-10 before the TSC votes on it this week: https://sel4.atlassian.net/browse/RFC-10 The RFC is about consolidating AArch64 page table objects and has been uncontroversial so far, just wanted to make sure people are aware of it. Cheers, Gerwin

2 1

Does the lastest master branch support gic v3 virtulization?
by wtliang785 10 Apr '22

10 Apr '22

hello devel, We want to use Sel4 in our project, but the gic version is v3. I know sel4 kernel 12.1.0 version does not support v3 virtuliazation. My question is that what is the status for supporting the v3 virtulization in lastest sel4 kernel master branch? Does the lastest master branch support gic v3 virtulization? thank you Peter Wang

2 1