Devel March 2022

devel@sel4.systems

22 participants
23 discussions

Report "Failed to touch ram region" error using virtio_console when assigned for Arm-VM more than 3G memory
by Han JingLong 韩景龙 21 Mar '22

21 Mar '22

Hi I had make virtio_console work well on my environment(armv8, RAM is 8G) based on vm_multi with Linux Guest OS(512M) and Android Guest OS(<= 3G) But I meet an error(vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157 Failed to touch ram region: Not registered RAM region) when assign for a VM(Android Guest OS) more than 3G memory. 1. Some logs are added for debugging this issue： +++ b/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul.c @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int emul_io_out(virtio_emul_t *emul, unsigned int offset, unsigned int si assert(size == 4); int queue = emul->virtq.queue; emul->virtq.queue_pfn[queue] = value; + printf("[hjl] queue_size:%d desc:%p\n", emul->virtq.queue_size[queue], (void *)(uintptr_t)(value << 12)); vring_init(&emul->virtq.vring[queue], emul->virtq.queue_size[queue], (void *)(uintptr_t)(value << 12), VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN); break; +++ b/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul_helpers.c @@ -25,10 +25,43 @@ static int write_guest_mem(vm_t *vm, uintptr_t phys, void *vaddr, size_t size, s int vm_guest_write_mem(vm_t *vm, void *data, uintptr_t address, size_t size) { + bool is_inram = false; + vm_mem_t *guest_memory = &vm->mem; + for (int i = 0; i < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; i++) { + if (guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start <= address && + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].size >= address + size) { + /* We are within a ram region*/ + is_inram = true; + } + } + + if (!is_inram) { + printf("[hjl] write mem addr:%p size:0x%lx\n", address, size); + for (int index = 0; index < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; index++) { + printf("[hjl] write mem ram_regions start:%p size:0x%lx\n", guest_memory->ram_regions[index].start, guest_memory->ram_regions[index].size); + } + } + return vm_ram_touch(vm, address, size, write_guest_mem, data); } int vm_guest_read_mem(vm_t *vm, void *data, uintptr_t address, size_t size) { + bool is_inram = false; + vm_mem_t *guest_memory = &vm->mem; + for (int i = 0; i < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; i++) { + if (guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start <= address && + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].start + guest_memory->ram_regions[i].size >= address + size) { + /* We are within a ram region*/ + is_inram = true; + } + } + + if (!is_inram) { + printf("[hjl] read mem addr:%p size:0x%lx\n", address, size); + for (int index = 0; index < guest_memory->num_ram_regions; index++) { + printf("[hjl] read mem ram_regions start:%p size:0x%lx\n", guest_memory->ram_regions[index].start, guest_memory->ram_regions[index].size); + } + } return vm_ram_touch(vm, address, size, read_guest_mem, data); } 2. The detailed log is as follows: [hjl] queue_size:128 desc:0x8eb6000 [hjl] queue_size:128 desc:0x8eb8000 [hjl] read mem addr:0x8eb8802 size:0x2 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x80000000 size:0x80000 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x80080000 size:0x17cda00 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8184da00 size:0xa5b2600 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8be00000 size:0x83ae98 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8c63ae98 size:0x29c5168 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8f000000 size:0x26d35 [hjl] read mem ram_regions start:0x8f026d35 size:0xc0fd92cb vm_ram_touch@guest_ram.c:157 Failed to touch ram region: Not registered RAM region 3. devices.camkes configuration reference is as follows: #define VM1_RAM_BASE 0x80000000 #define VM1_RAM_SIZE 0xD0000000 #define VM1_DTB_ADDR 0x8F000000 //VM1_RAM_BASE + 0xF000000 #define VM1_INITRD_ADDR 0x8BE00000 //VM1_DTB_ADDR - VM1_INITRD_MAX_SIZE vm1.untyped_mmios = [ "0x80000000:28", // RAM "0x90000000:28", // RAM "0xa0000000:28", // RAM "0xb0000000:28", // RAM "0xc0000000:28", // RAM "0xd0000000:28", // RAM "0xe0000000:28", // RAM "0xf0000000:28", // RAM "0x100000000:28", // RAM "0x110000000:28", // RAM "0x120000000:28", // RAM "0x130000000:28", // RAM "0x140000000:28", // RAM /* "0x150000000:28", // RAM "0x160000000:28", // RAM "0x170000000:28", // RAM "0x180000000:28", // RAM "0x190000000:28", // RAM "0x1a0000000:28", // RAM "0x1b0000000:28", // RAM */ ]; 4. Present situation: At present, I tracked and found that When the Guest OS's virtio_console driver do the probe, it created the vring and iowrite to notify VMM of the virtqueue desc 's physical address in setup_vq() /* create the vring */ static void *vring_alloc_queue(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag) { ...... void *queue = alloc_pages_exact(PAGE_ALIGN(size), flag); if (queue) { phys_addr_t phys_addr = virt_to_phys(queue); *dma_handle = (dma_addr_t)phys_addr; /* activate the queue */ iowrite32(virtqueue_get_desc_addr(vq) >> VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_ADDR_SHIFT, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_PFN); I'm very confused why is the physical memory allocated for virtqueue desc not within the effective memory range of VM when assign the memory to it exceeds 3G? BR. Allen 邮件免责申明 Email Disclaimer 本邮件仅供本邮件指定收件人使用，其所载内容可能因含有保密信息或其它原因而不得披露。除本公司及本邮件指定收件人外，任何人不得公开、传播、分发、复制、印刷或使用本邮件之任何部分或其所载之任何内容。如您误收到本邮件，请立即通知本公司，并将原始邮件、附件及其所有复本从系统中删除，切勿使用。 This email is for the use of the designated receivers only，and the content is not allowed to be disclosed due to the confidential information or other reasons. Except for the Company and the designated receivers of this email, no one shall disclose, disseminate, distribute, copy, print or use any part of this email or any content contained therein. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify the Company immediately, and delete the original email, attachments and all copies from the system. Do not use it. 网络通信可能含有计算机病毒或其它缺陷，可能无法准确和/或及时送达其它系统，亦可能受阻而不为本公司或本邮件指定收件人所知。本公司对此类错误或遗漏以及任何因使用本邮件而引致之任何损失概不承担责任。 Network communication may contain computer viruses or other defects, which may not be delivered to other systems accurately and / or in time, or may be blocked by the Company or the designated receivers of this email. The Company shall not be liable for such errors or omissions and for any loss arising from this email. 本邮件所载任何内容仅作为业务层面交流与参考，除非明确说明，本公司不对邮件所载内容之准确性、完整性或公平性等承担任何法律责任。 Any contents contained in this email are only for the purpose of business communication and reference only. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the Company shall not assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the content contained in the email. 本邮件指定收件人应特别注意：本邮件所载任何内容不构成本公司对本邮件指定收件人和/或其所属商业实体的任何要约、要约邀请或承诺，任何权利义务皆以双方签字盖章的书面文件为准。除经本公司以签字盖章的书面文件确认外，收件人和/或其所属商业实体不得以本邮件所载任何内容作为其向本公司主张任何权利或利益的正式依据。 The designated receivers should pay special attention to the fact that nothing contained in this email shall constitute an offer, invitation or acceptance by the Company to the designated receivers of this email and/or its affiliated business entities, and any rights and obligations are subject to the written documents signed and sealed by both parties. Except from the written document signed ,sealed and confirmed by the Company, the receivers and / or its affiliated business entity shall not rely on anything contained in this email as the formal basis for claiming any rights or interests to the Company.

1 0

A question about capability derivation tree
by Chang Liu 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

Hi list, Here is a question about capability derivation trees, in particular when it comes to seL4_CNode_Copy and seL4_CNode_Mint. Suppose I have an untyped cap Untyped0, and I create a page cap by retyping Untyped0 into Frame0 (with seL4_AllRights). I then call CNode_Mint to mint Frame0 into Frame1 with restricted rights (say read-only). Finally, I call CNode_Copy to copy Frame1 into Frame2. What would the capability derivation tree look like at the end? Case 1: |--------| |Untyped0| |--------| / | \ / | \ / | \ |------| |------| |------| |Frame0| |Frame1| |Frame2| |------| |------| |------| Case 2: |--------| |Untyped0| |--------| | |------| |Frame0| |------| | |------| |Frame1| |------| | |------| |Frame2| |------| Case 3: |--------| |Untyped0| |--------| | |------| |Frame0| |------| / \ / \ |------| |------| |Frame1| |Frame2| |------| |------| Which one of the above is the correct answer? I suspect it's case 3, but I'm not sure. Best, Chang

1 0

Sel4 VMM Virtio Net Related Porting on Other SOC
by Tao Heng 陶恒-SW 11 Mar '22

11 Mar '22

Finally, I figured out the root cause of this issue. It happened when I changed the mac address of the virtio net probed for the vm guest. According to the issue, It seemed that the virtio_net driver of the libsel4vmmsupport did not support emulating the io control for changing the mac addess of the virtio net in the guest. 发件人: Tao Heng 陶恒-SW 发送时间: 2022年3月9日 14:49 收件人: 'devel(a)sel4.systems' <devel(a)sel4.systems> 主题: Sel4 VMM Virtio Net Related Porting on Other SOC Hi everyone , Background: I was porting vm_virtio_net project on other platforms with Cortex-A55. I met a run error with : ----------------------------------------- Unhandled offset of 0x14 of size 1, writing 0x2 Assertion failed: !"panic" (/home/kuang/workspace/penoy/system/core/seL4_projects_libs/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul.c: emul_io_out: 109) --------------------------------------------------- While it ran well on qemu with linux kernel version 4.9.189, my linux kernel version for the SOC is 4.14.61. If I replaced the qemu linux kernel with my kernel, the vm_virtio_net project also ran well on the qemu platform. To my analyzation, your virtio_net driver should be able to support for my platform. Is this related to my dts configuration for PCI node? 邮件免责申明 Email Disclaimer 本邮件仅供本邮件指定收件人使用，其所载内容可能因含有保密信息或其它原因而不得披露。除本公司及本邮件指定收件人外，任何人不得公开、传播、分发、复制、印刷或使用本邮件之任何部分或其所载之任何内容。如您误收到本邮件，请立即通知本公司，并将原始邮件、附件及其所有复本从系统中删除，切勿使用。 This email is for the use of the designated receivers only，and the content is not allowed to be disclosed due to the confidential information or other reasons. Except for the Company and the designated receivers of this email, no one shall disclose, disseminate, distribute, copy, print or use any part of this email or any content contained therein. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify the Company immediately, and delete the original email, attachments and all copies from the system. Do not use it. 网络通信可能含有计算机病毒或其它缺陷，可能无法准确和/或及时送达其它系统，亦可能受阻而不为本公司或本邮件指定收件人所知。本公司对此类错误或遗漏以及任何因使用本邮件而引致之任何损失概不承担责任。 Network communication may contain computer viruses or other defects, which may not be delivered to other systems accurately and / or in time, or may be blocked by the Company or the designated receivers of this email. The Company shall not be liable for such errors or omissions and for any loss arising from this email. 本邮件所载任何内容仅作为业务层面交流与参考，除非明确说明，本公司不对邮件所载内容之准确性、完整性或公平性等承担任何法律责任。 Any contents contained in this email are only for the purpose of business communication and reference only. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the Company shall not assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the content contained in the email. 本邮件指定收件人应特别注意：本邮件所载任何内容不构成本公司对本邮件指定收件人和/或其所属商业实体的任何要约、要约邀请或承诺，任何权利义务皆以双方签字盖章的书面文件为准。除经本公司以签字盖章的书面文件确认外，收件人和/或其所属商业实体不得以本邮件所载任何内容作为其向本公司主张任何权利或利益的正式依据。 The designated receivers should pay special attention to the fact that nothing contained in this email shall constitute an offer, invitation or acceptance by the Company to the designated receivers of this email and/or its affiliated business entities, and any rights and obligations are subject to the written documents signed and sealed by both parties. Except from the written document signed ,sealed and confirmed by the Company, the receivers and / or its affiliated business entity shall not rely on anything contained in this email as the formal basis for claiming any rights or interests to the Company.

2 1

Sel4 VMM Virtio Net Related Porting on Other SOC
by Tao Heng 陶恒-SW 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

Hi everyone , Background: I was porting vm_virtio_net project on other platforms with Cortex-A55. I met a run error with : ----------------------------------------- Unhandled offset of 0x14 of size 1, writing 0x2 Assertion failed: !"panic" (/home/kuang/workspace/penoy/system/core/seL4_projects_libs/seL4_projects_libs/libsel4vmmplatsupport/src/drivers/virtio_emul.c: emul_io_out: 109) --------------------------------------------------- While it ran well on qemu with linux kernel version 4.9.189, my linux kernel version for the SOC is 4.14.61. If I replaced the qemu linux kernel with my kernel, the vm_virtio_net project also ran well on the qemu platform. To my analyzation, your virtio_net driver should be able to support for my platform. Is this related to my dts configuration for PCI node? 邮件免责申明 Email Disclaimer 本邮件仅供本邮件指定收件人使用，其所载内容可能因含有保密信息或其它原因而不得披露。除本公司及本邮件指定收件人外，任何人不得公开、传播、分发、复制、印刷或使用本邮件之任何部分或其所载之任何内容。如您误收到本邮件，请立即通知本公司，并将原始邮件、附件及其所有复本从系统中删除，切勿使用。 This email is for the use of the designated receivers only，and the content is not allowed to be disclosed due to the confidential information or other reasons. Except for the Company and the designated receivers of this email, no one shall disclose, disseminate, distribute, copy, print or use any part of this email or any content contained therein. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify the Company immediately, and delete the original email, attachments and all copies from the system. Do not use it. 网络通信可能含有计算机病毒或其它缺陷，可能无法准确和/或及时送达其它系统，亦可能受阻而不为本公司或本邮件指定收件人所知。本公司对此类错误或遗漏以及任何因使用本邮件而引致之任何损失概不承担责任。 Network communication may contain computer viruses or other defects, which may not be delivered to other systems accurately and / or in time, or may be blocked by the Company or the designated receivers of this email. The Company shall not be liable for such errors or omissions and for any loss arising from this email. 本邮件所载任何内容仅作为业务层面交流与参考，除非明确说明，本公司不对邮件所载内容之准确性、完整性或公平性等承担任何法律责任。 Any contents contained in this email are only for the purpose of business communication and reference only. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the Company shall not assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the content contained in the email. 本邮件指定收件人应特别注意：本邮件所载任何内容不构成本公司对本邮件指定收件人和/或其所属商业实体的任何要约、要约邀请或承诺，任何权利义务皆以双方签字盖章的书面文件为准。除经本公司以签字盖章的书面文件确认外，收件人和/或其所属商业实体不得以本邮件所载任何内容作为其向本公司主张任何权利或利益的正式依据。 The designated receivers should pay special attention to the fact that nothing contained in this email shall constitute an offer, invitation or acceptance by the Company to the designated receivers of this email and/or its affiliated business entities, and any rights and obligations are subject to the written documents signed and sealed by both parties. Except from the written document signed ,sealed and confirmed by the Company, the receivers and / or its affiliated business entity shall not rely on anything contained in this email as the formal basis for claiming any rights or interests to the Company.

1 0

Does the CSpace needs to have a cap to the TCB
by Sid Agrawal 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

Hi, We roughly do the following steps when setting up a new process in seL4: - Allocate a new TCB - Allocate new CSpace - Make the TCB point to the CSpace - Construct the VSpace and add the relevant caps in the new CSpace - Update the VSpace cap in the TCB. - Add a copy of the TCB cap in the new CSpace. (I am looking at the process spawn function in libesel4utils at: https://github.com/seL4/seL4_libs/blob/master/libsel4utils/src/process.c#L4…) My question is about the last point i.e. copying of TCB to the new CSpace. If I want to restrict the new domain from changing its VSpace, suspend itself, and change its fault handlers, I would simply not do the last step. Will that work? Is there any fundamental need for the TCB cap to be in the cspace it points to? Thanks, Sidhartha Agrawal

2 1

vm_multi usage
by Michael Neises 08 Mar '22

08 Mar '22

Hi, I'm just beginning to use multiple VMs at once, and I have a simple question. When I simulate my image, two VMs are running, and I get a terminal interface to one of them. Can I also switch my terminal to interface with the second VM? Cheers, Michael Neises

2 1

Re: I Have some questions about the domain mechanism in the seL4
by Isaac Beckett 08 Mar '22

08 Mar '22

> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 19:15:05 +1100 > From: Kent Mcleod <kent.mcleod72(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [seL4] Re: I Have some questions about the domain mechanism > in the seL4 > To: 603644559(a)qq.com > Cc: devel <devel(a)sel4.systems> > Message-ID: > <CA+-ozWdgMgBin34WBUoVL+uHSNfU=e852ekPgrNGZ5J7+nyN0g(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 6:11 PM 603644559--- via Devel >> <devel(a)sel4.systems> wrote: >> >> For some reason, i m learning the scheduling module in seL4. I have read the manual and the source code, and i have already read the answer in the link https://lists.sel4.systems/hyperkitty/list/devel@sel4.systems/thread/VYRTG3… >> But i still do not know the purpose of adding the domain mechanism in seL4, >> Can anyone explain what kind of requirement led to the design of the domain mechanism? >> Please explain it more specifically, and it would be best if there were relevant documents and papers on the domain mechanism. > > It was added in order to enable the completion of the info-flow proofs. > >> From the infoflow proof paper > (https://trustworthy.systems/publications/nicta_full_text/6464.pdf) > where it is called the partition scheduler: > "Similarly, the original seL4 scheduler, before partition > scheduling was implemented, was known not to enforce > isolation. We could not prove information flow security until > we had fully and correctly specified the partition scheduler > in the updated abstract specification. Proving information > flow security then required us to show that the scheduler’s > choice about which partition to schedule next can never be > affected by any other partition, as one would expect." Hello! It was my understanding that seL4 used to not have an in-kernel scheduler, and scheduling was up to the root task. How did that work? And why was the choice made to add the MCS features? Basically, why the change from having scheduling in the kernel vs. in userspace? It’s probably more convenient, especially since most operating systems are used to having scheduling in the kernel itself (so easier for people to think about). There are probably more technical reasons too. What are those?

2 3

I Have some questions about the domain mechanism in the seL4
by 603644559＠qq.com 07 Mar '22

07 Mar '22

For some reason, i m learning the scheduling module in seL4. I have read the manual and the source code, and i have already read the answer in the link https://lists.sel4.systems/hyperkitty/list/devel@sel4.systems/thread/VYRTG3… But i still do not know the purpose of adding the domain mechanism in seL4, Can anyone explain what kind of requirement led to the design of the domain mechanism? Please explain it more specifically, and it would be best if there were relevant documents and papers on the domain mechanism.

2 2

Reminder: sel4 developer hangout
by Birgit Brecknell 07 Mar '22

07 Mar '22

Hi all A friendly reminder that the seL4 developer hangout is on this week: Tue, Mar 22, 9pm (UTC), Topics: (open) * Sydney: Wed, Mar 23, 8am * Central Europe: Tue, Mar 22, 10pm * US Pacific Time: Tue, Mar 22, 1pm (There are too many time zones in the world to cite them all :)) Zoom link: https://unsw.zoom.us/j/82640784431 Cheers, Birg --- Dr. Birgit Brecknell Project Officer Trustworthy Systems, UNSW, birgit.brecknell(a)unsw.edu.au seL4 Foundation, birgit(a)sel4.systems 0433 880 571 Mon 9am-5pm Wed 9am-12pm Fri 9am-5pm

1 0

Questions about shared page tables and Intel's MPK
by Sid Agrawal 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

Hi, I have a couple of questions about the virtual memory subsystem in seL4. 1. Intel's Memory Protection keys let a process restrict the access to given virtual address ranges based on a key. This key is the bit 62:59 of the virtual address. It is stored in the PTE of the level 4/5 Page Table. I want to use this feature in my project. Does seL4 support the setting of Memory Protection keys for virtual addresses? I couldn't find any mention of it in the source. I understand that if I use the current API of "seL4_X86_PageTable_Map" with those higher bits of the vaddr set, the kernel will ignore them. Is my understanding correct? Furthermore, was a decision made not to support MPK at some point? 2. As per section 7.3 of the seL4 manual, seL4 doesn't allow sharing of page tables. I am trying to understand the reasoning behind this. Was this done to aid verification? Thanks, Sidhartha S Agrawal

3 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

Devel March 2022